Advertisement
As EU foreign ministers to meet to discuss benefit tourism, Sweden ask the question "what's the fuss?"
Monday, 03 June 2013
One of the areas where some EU countries have been vocal about has been
the effects of benefit tourism. Sweden which has some how been quite
about it or knows how to manage it is beginning to ask whether
political populism is the force driving the fear that is really not
there.
The EU mobility debate on benefit tourism has flared up again, with
some states arguing that with the freedom of movement, EU citizens
would seek other EU countries and try to take advantage of their
generous welfare system. This refer to countries that are about to join
the free movement, work and settle such as Romania and Bulgaria.
This issue has been put on the agenda in the meeting which the Swedish
migration minister, Tobias Billström and his EU colleagues from the UK,
Germany, Austria and the Netherlands are to meet in the week. On the
agenda is benefit tourism, something Sweden does not see as vital for
there don't seem to be a serious problem there. If it were a big deal,
Sweden with a booming economy would have been attracting lots of
Spanish, Portuguese, Greeks etc., which has very poor economies at this
moment. However, the numbers coming here is not as large as one would
have thought.
Tobias Billstrom has been vocal that he does not see the big deal about
the whole benefit issue and questions how realistic the issue is.
Speaking to Swedish news agency TT, Mr Billstrom said that "I think
there is a scare mongering building into this as we from the Swedish
government level do not see such," he says.
Swedish EU Commissioner, Cecilia Malmström, who deals with these types
of issues believe that there is a "smell of populism and domestic
policy." She notes that the four countries' giving the warnings have
not done so with the support from the European Commission's statistics.
She also reacts to the language used in addressing the issue. EU
citizens have the right to travel, live, work and study wherever they
want in the Union but they are treated as immigrants from outside the
EU. For example, they are called with the word "European
immigrants," a concept that does not exist," said Malmstrom.
"They mix apples and pears very healthily. They confuse internal EU
mobility and immigration. They list problems without giving a single
figure, a single concrete example and want us to review the rules on
free movement. Of course it is unthinkable that we should change the
principle of freedom of movement," said Malmstrom.
Authorities believe that economic problems are the force fuelling the
debate. When the countries of Eastern and Central Europe became members
of the EU, it started a debate on social tourism, among others, the
then Swedish Prime Minister, Göran Persson also threw himself into the
debate.
When the concerns did not come to reality, the debate subsided, but
recently it has gained momentum again. Economic crisis and the success
of Euro sceptic and immigration critical political parties and
movements in many areas have fuelled the fears of benefit tourists
again.
Last week, Britain was sued to the European Court, as it was believed
that it discriminated against EU citizens and made it hard for them to
access social benefits than the British.
Britain is one of those countries where anti EU politics has grown
and is bringing panic within the political establishment there.
by Scancomark.com Team