Companies News
The
Market Quotes Powered By Forexpros, the Forex, Futures, and Stock Markets Portal.
Swedish state owned energy company, Vattenfall heavily criticised in Germany
Thursday, 08 March 2012
The Swedish
state – owned energy company, Vattenfall, had received harsh criticism
in Germany because the company neglected to report that they used steel
drums which contained radio active component but it was not reported
and no action was taken by the company to redress the issue.
The effect now
is that German local politician wants that the authorities ban
Vattenfall from running nuclear plants in Germany. Vattenfall has
reportedly accepted that they failed to disclose the information.
This happened
on the Vattenfall run nuclear plant in Brunsbüttel, Germany which was
recently closed as such when regulatory authority inspected it, they
found the rusted steel drums with low-emittance nuclear waste in.
German authorities are now moving the 500 barrels of the waste from the
underground storage at Brunsüttel to an abandoned mine.
Schleswig-Holstein
state Justice Minister Emil Schmalfuβ joined in the criticism Wednesday
and said Vattenfall should have reported the rusty barrels to the
authorities. But no radioactivity had leaked.
The criticism
from German politicians is that Vattenfall failed to report it to the
authorities even though they knew about it back in December. Vattenfall
has repeatedly failed to inform the public or informed the public
wrongly according to the Germans authorities. They believe that
Vattenfall is not a reliable nuclear power operator as they grossly
underestimate the risks involved with nuclear power and also how
sensitive the public is to the of the risks associated with its
waste.
Vattenfall has
recognized that information is broken and that it is unacceptable. Now
the company has launched an investigation to find out where it failed,
according to Ivo Banek who is CIO at German Vattenfall.
“We do not have
the whole picture yet, but it does not seem that the internal
communication worked well. Those in the organization who would have
been informed were not. Right now, we’ll examine who was informed or
not and when and how. Then we'll see what action needs to betaken to
ensure that we get direct information in the future. We regret that it
was not so in this case,” says Ivo Banek.
By Scancomark.se Team
What do you think about this
article or us? Please leave a comment. Thank you!